Nossos serviços estão apresentando instabilidade no momento. Algumas informações podem não estar disponíveis.
-
Home
-
Geosciences
-
Territorial organization
-
Geographic networks and flows
- NP-Territory Management
Territory Management | 2014
About the publication - 2014
The 2014 Territory Management study identified 2,204 municipalities that form management centers in the country, which are ranked in 9 levels of territory management centrality.
For this purpose, two database sets were used: the first is formed by information about the internal organizational structure of the considered public institutions (National Institute for Social Security – INSS, Ministry of Labor and Employment, Secretariat of the Federal Revenue, Federal Court, Regional Electoral Courts, Regional Labor Courts, besides the IBGE), surveyed in 2013; whereas the second one is formed by the headquarters and private enterprise branches relationship, as long as they are located in different municipalities, with the Central Register of Enterprises – CEMPRE, of the IBGE, having 2011 as reference. Moreover, in the publication there are detailed analyzes of the municipalities’ centrality and of the management flow for each one of these topics that form the general database.
Main results - 2014
More on the product - 2014
Publication
Applications
-
Databases and Tables
Municipal database: includes the survey information related to each municipality, including its classification of centrality. The levels of the public institutions are similar to the IBGE regionalization. Therefore, level 1 is similar to microregions, level 2 is similar to mesoregions, level 3 to states, level 4 to macroregions and level 5 to Union.
Flows of public management: include information related to the liaisons between pairs of municipalities. The origin and destination of the flows are arbitrary, since the liaisons are carried out in both ways, according to the experience of the selected public institutions. The origin of the liaison was considered the lower-level municipality in the pair, according to the internal organization of each institution. The destination of the liaison was considered the higher-level municipality, according to the organization of each institution.
High level flows: include the information related to the higher-level liaisons of the public institutions, among pairs of municipalities. Only the connection between the headquarters of the institutions and their immediately lower levels were considered. The origin of the liaison was considered the lower-level municipality in the pair, according to the internal organization of each institution. The destination of the liaison was considered the higher-level municipality, according to the internal organization of each institution.
Flows of business management: include the information related to the business liaisons among pairs of municipalities.
Maps (in PDF format)- Map 1 - INSS: structure and liaisons
- Map 2 - INSS: number of branches
- Map 3 - Ministry of Labor and Employment: structure and liaisons
- Map 4 - Federal Revenue of Brazil: structure and liaisons
- Map 5 - IBGE: structure and liaisons
- Map 6 - Ordinary Federal Justice: structure and liaisons
- Map 7 - Electoral Justice: structure and liaisons
- Map 8 - Electoral Justice: number of electoral wards
- Map 9 - Labor Justice: structure and liaisons
- Map 10 - Labor Justice: number of labor courts
- Map 11 - Centrality of the public management - 2013
- Map 12 - Municipalities without selected federal public institutions
- Map 13 - Liaisons of the public institutions
- Map 14 - High level liaisons of the public institutions
- Map 15a - Intensity of the liaisons by Municipality, according to the high levels of centrality
- Map 15b - Intensity of the liaisons by Municipality - Regional Capitals and Subregional Centers
- Map 16 - Intensity of the liaisons by pairs of municipalities, according to the higher hundredth of the distribution
- Map 17 - Leadership role of the municipalities, according to the number of salaried persons outside their limits
- Map 18 - External salaried persons in São Paulo - SP, according to the controlled territorial units
- Map 19 - External salaried persons in Rio de Janeiro - RJ, according to the controlled territorial units
- Map 20 - External salaried persons in Brasília - DF, according to the controlled territorial units
- Map 21 - Percentage of supply of advanced services to support enterprises, according to the higher tenth of the distribution
- Map 22- The centrality of the territory management - 2013
Learn more - 2014
Downloads
FAQ
What is the difference between the urban area established by the REGIC survey and the levels of centrality identified in Territorial Management?
The levels of centrality identified in the survey Territorial Management are some of the inputs to establish the hierarchy in the REGIC urban areas, especially for the highest layers of the urban hierarchy, as Metropolises and Regional Capitals. Although the hierarchy in the REGIC urban areas consider other factors, such as the capacity of appealing population to consume goods and services, which includes, for example, the population flows from small municipalities to municipalities with bigger market centers.
Your question was not answered here?
Please contact us through our service channels.